Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | r2_pilot's commentslogin

If I recall correctly they didn't miss Mars. Quite the opposite, really.

Mars missed them?

The Purpose Of a System Is What It Does. Whether it is stated (or even designed) to protect kids, if it does anything more or different from that goal, it will perform those actions regardless of what is said about what the System should be doing.

Instead of building common cause among your allies, got it. Thankfully I presume you are not in a position where your decisions drive policy.


Allies, eh?

I defer to Sir Humphrey on these matters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVYqB0uTKlE

"To create a disunited Europe"


Real shades of "that cable shouldn't have been dressed like that, in a dark and narrow channel, clearly marked on navigation charts(to mitigate exactly this scenario, from good captains at least)" energy.


>>"I think 2025 was less productive"

I think 2025 is more productive for me based on measurable metrics such as code contribution to my projects, better ability to ingest and act upon information, and generally I appreciate the Anthropic tax because Claude genuinely has been a step-change improvement in my life.


> more productive for me based on measurable metrics such as code contribution to my projects

Isn‘t it generally agreed upon that counting contributions, LoC or similar metrics is a very bad way to gauge productivity?


During 2025 I've almost exhausted my personal TODO-list of small applications and created a few extra ones.

This would've never happened without a Claude Pro (+ChatGPT) subscription.

And as I'm not American, none of them are aimed to be subscription based SaaS offerings, they're just simple CLI applications for my personal use. If someone else enjoys them, good for them. =)


I don't care about industry metrics when I'm building my own AI research robotics platform and it's doing what I ask it to do, proving itself in the real world far better than any performative best-practice theatrics in the service of risible MBA-grade effluvia masquerading as critical discourse.


A research robot for exploring AI/human/etc interactions. Someone put the wrong price on Thor for some reason and it arrives tomorrow.


Instead of casually dismissing the idea, perhaps they considered it and found recharging had its own engineering costs, namely the potential for a swelling battery on your finger, a long life which means you probably would lose a custom charger, and the increased size for the extra requirements.


It could be, from a certain point of view.


Thank you, Obi Wan.


Not CBP but see Carlos Jimenez for an example of what's currently happening.


> Surely reading comprehension is still required for, well, reading AI-generated text.

Found the optimist. (no, it unfortunately not required. Imagine, if you will, the world's worst version of the Telephone game...)


Sure, but the same failure mode exists for readers of human writing.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: