Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Using the MS stack for a situation where you will have huge spikes of activity on an app with an expected lifespan of less than 24 hours is not best practice.


I'm an open source developer – working on Linux servers since 1997 or so, etc. etc. Please stop what you're doing: it's not very funny and it's not helpful, but it does give OSS people a bad reputation.

You can host plenty of high volume things on Microsoft's code – Azure, Bing, etc. have proven scale. We can argue about cost, ease of use, etc. but a decent team should have no trouble making a serious service. The problem here is that they didn't hire a decent team – from the sounds of it, it was the usual executive-level schmoozing and managerial incomplete you see throughout large organizations of every type. They could have used HN'a favorite stack and failed just as hard.


> managerial incomplete

I'm guessing you wrote this post using autocompetence?


Sigh, yes. iOS auto-uncorrection to the rescue!


This comment reminds me of AL Gore lecturing Frank Zapa.


Hey, dogs can swim but that doesn't mean I use them to pull a barge up the river.

I will not shut up about the ground truth I and many other people know about Microsoft and their software.


The way you're doing it won't will anyone over. Open source has been winning where I work because we've demonstrated better results with less cost. I suggest you try to outperform rather than out-market.


A poor craftsman blames their tools.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: