Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hello, fellow 40-45(?) year old.

I feel like anyone preferring Warcraft III is in their 30s. Grew up with the Warcraft II Battle Chest and it was a vibe.

 help



Hey, lots of us 39 year olds who played Warcraft 2!

I had a pirated version on a zip drive

people wax poetic about betamax and laserdisk but never heard anyone mention zip drive, in a good or bad way, lol

Before cd-rs, it felt like magic. Like a floppy but 100 times bigger!

I was the kid with the backpack Zip drive and Zip disks, like a weird Santa Claus of game piracy. Duke3d, Descent, Quake, you name it. All of it was in service of modem dueling each other. Wild times!

It was magical for about 2 years, then USB drives came along and made it look quaint.

IOMagic Zip Drive?

38 even!

My goodness, it's scary how much I reminisce about long summer days doing nothing but playing War2 over Kali before the days of Battle.net.

I recently replayed Warcraft II and fell out of my chair when I realized the original did not have control groups. Those were only added with the Battle.Net edition!

Same. It was the best of times. It was the worst of times.

Mostly the best of times

38, I played 2, but it was pretty bad compared to Warcraft III. Three still holds up just as well as it did back then.

Not to be a patronizing old fart, but may I assume that you played II after III? If so I can understand it, but II was very special when it came out, and I never revisited it after.

I think it's a case of being better when it came out than another thing was when it came out, despite the other thing being comparatively better without the context of its time.


2 is a much harder game in my opinion. I don’t think even at the hardest difficulty level Warcraft 3 has any levels that require you to do a contested marine landing and then build a base before immediately being attacked again. The final Orc mission took me forever to beat. And the expansion? Good lord.

IMO, Starcraft 1 is better than both 2 and 3.

III has a better and more interesting story telling. But gameplay wise I really like the starcraft 1 system without the heros. I think warcraft 3 adds too much complexity and gimmickry that takes away from fun RTS gameplay.

That said, Warcraft 3 mods were the shit. There were so many fun and inventive modes of play that you could just barely do with starcraft and not at all with warcraft.


Warcraft 3 custom map mod was the birth of Defense of the Ancients Allstars which then became its own game by Valve as Dota 2 (and Blizzard was pissed and tried legal stuff to reclaim) which now became Deadlock = Dota 3.

It's been a while ...


42 here, played a ton of Warcraft II, but my favorite to return to now is definitely Warcraft III (or AoE II).

33 here, started with Dark Saga in my old PS1, after few months of my first gameplay got a used computer and played A LOT of warcraft 1 and 2.

PS: I still own the same PS1, tho the reader might not working 100%.


I mean, I’m 37 and my first ever RTS was Warcraft: Orcs and humans. Never liked the hero focus of w3

Same. I think it adds just too much complexity to an RTS where I want to just have an army to control.

Were it not so buggy, I think C&C generals ranks pretty high on fun modern RTSes.


If only the mods didn't crash so much.

Try Generals Evolution mod for RA3.

48, and I'm a medieval man.

Speaking as a 44-year-old, this tracks.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: