Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Maybe. But it's been 3 years and it still isn't good enough to actually trust. That doesn't raise confidence that it will ever get there.
 help



You need to put this revolution in scale with other revolutions.

How long did it take for horses to be super-seeded by cars?

How long did powertool take to become the norm for tradesmen?

This has gone unbelievably fast.


I think things can only be called revolutions in hindsight - while they are going on it's hard to tell if they are a true revolution, an evolution or a dead-end. So I think it's a little premature to call Generative AI a revolution.

AI will get there and replace humans at many tasks, machine learning already has, I'm not completely sure that generative AI will be the route we take, it is certainly superficially convincing, but those three years have not in fact seen huge progress IMO - huge amounts of churn and marketing versions yes, but not huge amounts of concrete progress or upheaval. Lots of money has been spent for sure! It is telling for me that many of the real founders at OpenAI stepped away - and I don't think that's just Altman, they're skeptical of the current approach.

PS Superseded.


*superseded

It comes from the Latin "supersedēre", which taken literally, means "sit on top of". "Super" = above, on top of. "Sedēre" = to sit.

"Super" is already familiar to English speakers. "Sedēre" is the root of words like sedentary, sedan, sedate, reside, and preside.

The more metaphorical meaning of "supersede" as "replace" developed over time and across languages, but the literal meaning is already fairly close.


>super-seeded

Cute eggcorn there.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: