You’d do both because up can. Why mine in Australia when you have the US or Cana... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		prepend 31 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Greenland's natural resources are nearly impos... You’d do both because up can. Why mine in Australia when you have the US or Canada, etc etc. The idea would mine in all places where it’s marginally profitable until your capital is fully committed.

dukeyukey 31 days ago [–]

Because those places are close enough in profitability that it doesn't make a massive difference.

Greenland is real hard to mine in, needs infrastructure from scratch, and nowhere near enough of a local population.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact