Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It’s hard to read writing packed with defensive clauses.

Better to say what you need to say. Leave the defense for the occasion someone misunderstood what you meant to say.



It's further pretty hard to write like this, but I still prefer it over getting trivially checkmated by ill meaning people, and over being misinterpreted silently and that causing issues downstream. It's at this point an instinctual defense mechanism, that I've grown to organically develop in the low-trust environments that are forums like this.


I 100% agree with the principle, but (regrettably) in practice you can't do this in a lot of places where the community is critical (which isn't a bad thing by itself) but doesn't call out/downvote/moderate bad criticism (which is bad).

I can't count the number of times on HN that I've seen responses to posts that took advantage of the poster not writing defensively to emotionally attack them in ways that absolutely break the HN guidelines, and weren't flagged or downvoted. And on other sites, like Reddit, it's just the norm.

The defensive writing will continue until morals improve.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: