I agree with you that it shouldn't. What I was trying to do is suggest that for some people it might be a function of the money.
The suggestion I made was so that the person that gets chosen to donate would be delighted that he was chosen (ahead of 99 others), and when someone is delighted, how can one argue it's exploitation?
The suggestion I made was so that the person that gets chosen to donate would be delighted that he was chosen (ahead of 99 others), and when someone is delighted, how can one argue it's exploitation?