I mean, this is just a “sufficient misinformation” argument that could be levied against literally any kind of policy. No policy can survive sufficient misinformation.
The point I am making is not a rebuttal to this specific proposal but that any such change will have an attack vector. Hell, the reason we are having this discussion is because of the (unfortunate) case of someone not being served by the current policy. Any new change to the policy will have such cases which will lead to this same discussion.
Creating an equitable drug approval process is a true dilemma.
