Yes, the review paper appears to be roughly conditioned on "using data that academics can readily access or generate".
Clearly, this doesn't generalise to cases where you have highly specific data (e.g. if you're Google).
However, cases with large societal impact are more likely to be the latter? They may perhaps better be viewed as "conditioned on data that is so valuable that nobody is going to publish or explain it", which kind of is in the complement of the review?
Clearly, this doesn't generalise to cases where you have highly specific data (e.g. if you're Google).
However, cases with large societal impact are more likely to be the latter? They may perhaps better be viewed as "conditioned on data that is so valuable that nobody is going to publish or explain it", which kind of is in the complement of the review?