But developers are much better at describing what they need so there is much less need for meetings in those scenarios, instead they just send emails or open bug reports that gets resolved without the meetings.
Generally, I'd agree, but I've also worked with developers who are as egotistical, shortsighted, and/or stupid as the worst person with any other title.
Being a logical, cooperative, well-communicating human being is not a requirement to be a developer.
> Being a logical, cooperative, well-communicating human being is not a requirement to be a developer.
If your company is fine with them being unable to communicate then your company obviously is fine with you not being able to communicate as well, so why try? And if your company hires people who are good at communicating then there is little need for meetings between developers except politics, and most developers shouldn't have to deal directly with company politics.
