Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Re 2.: OTOH, the bias is extremely tiny, there's only 2 out of 2^31 cases which are problematic, or one in a billion. A generic RNG obviously shouldn't do it this way, but for most applications it would be good-enough really.


The article claims that "it is indeed a uniform distribution" so I wanted to point it out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: