Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
simonw
on Jan 9, 2011
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Node.JS 0.3.4 out (with experimental HTTPS)
Have you considered Redis for persistence in place of MongoDB? It's excellent for stats applications.
dangrossman
on Jan 9, 2011
|
next
[–]
There are companies doing stats applications using MongoDB too. It's supposedly one of its strengths. I'll look into Redis too, though.
mcs
on Jan 9, 2011
|
parent
|
next
[–]
I've seen people using MongoDB in memory only as a cache, so that they can mapreduce it. Even without that, it's writes to disk are async so it's fast.
cdavid
on Jan 9, 2011
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
What's the point of map reduce if data can be held in memory ?
yezooz
on Jan 9, 2011
|
prev
[–]
why do you think it's better than MongoDB for stats?
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
