Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Of course there wouldn't be as much fuss about it. Trump losing the election would imply that the attempts at influencing people were unsuccessful. At a glance, that would indicate that regulation is unnecessary (though detailed analysis could show otherwise).


Foreign spending on political FB ads was a drop in the ocean. Especially when you consider it played to both sides (acknowledge it leaned towards Trump), was not all in swing states, and a lot of it was after the election. This is almost certainly not about them.


So, in other words, only regulate to prevent challengers. This is precisely what Facebook and the political establishment hope to achieve.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: