Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xmichael909's commentslogin

love the intentional use of udnerstand, brilliant!


I don't think there is one. Honestly this version 1 is dead on arrival.


Check out http://www.openmptcprouter.com which works excellent!


Personally not a fan of Windows 95 in the browser, however the browser stoped being a “document reader” a decade ago it’s the only universel, sandbox runtime, and everything is moving in that direction ... safe code. WASM isnt a worst VM; it’s a diffrent trade off: portable, fast start, capability scoped compute without shiping a OS. Raw device still have their place (servers). If you need safe distribution + performance thats “good enough” WASM in the browser is going to be the future of client.


A decade ago? Gmail was launched in 2004, 21 years ago.


XMLHttpRequest was part of IE5 in 1999 as an ActiveXObject. Outlook Web team built it a year earlier.


Not to mention Java applets which is how you would do this sort of thing in the early 2000s


Ever tried to build something with IP cameras and put the word ONVIF on your site? ONVIF.org will come after you with trademark threats. Doesn’t matter if your product really supports it, or if it’s even open source. They’ll tell you to delete “ONVIF-compatible” unless you cough up for their $20,000/year membership.

It feels backwards ... engineers need to say if things interoperate, customers search for “ONVIF” to check compatibility, yet instead of helping adoption they act like brand cops. Is this normal for “open standards”? Or is ONVIF.org just uniquely hostile here? I don't think they are right here, but having released a completely free product and got a trademark and a demand for 20k a year and being told I cannot use the word ONVIF in any way shape or form seems insane! Thoughts?


Same thing with Bluetooth and WiFi products, no license, no use of their trademark.


OOMKiller... in most cases where it has killed things, i feel it would’ve been far better to just let the system slog along and spill onto disk instead of killing the process outright, or as the article says killing the wrong process like it always seems to do.


whenever this happens I have to reboot my system anyways because it becomes unuseable, e.g. it becomes impossible to type / move the mouse for >1 hour. between me hitting the hardware reset button of my computer (or sometimes the power plug on more modern userspace-based reset buttons) vs just killing a process, I know what I prefer


You know that's exactly what swap is right? You can enable swapping if that's the behaviour you want.


Thanks Tips....


Thanks for the tools, we had some fun with them. We build in full MoQ support for MediaMTX with 200-300ms latency - demo at https://moq.wink.co/moq-player.html GitHub: https://github.com/winkmichael/mediamtx-moq

Also our take on MoQ https://www.wink.co/documentation/WINK-MoQ-Implementation-An...


Our company just put this out, full MoQ support for MediaMTX with 200-300ms latency - demo at https://moq.wink.co/moq-player.html

GitHub: https://github.com/winkmichael/mediamtx-moq

We implemented both WebTransport (for browsers) and native QUIC (for server-to-server) after discovering browsers block raw QUIC. Works today in Chrome/Edge, integrates with existing RTMP/RTSP streams in MediaMTX.


Seems to hallucinate more than any model I've ever worked with in the past 6 months.


DeepSeek is bad for hallucinations in my experience. I wouldn't trust its output for anything serious without heavy grounding. It's great for fantastical fiction though. It also excels at giving characters "agency".


Where would you go to find people posting their AI generated fiction? I haven't been able to find it on Reddit


AO3 has several tags for it.


I should have said, I am looking for posted chat logs where the prompts are shared as well. I really enjoy the process of making stories with AI and I am curious to see how others do the same thing.


Look at NovelCrafter.

They have a great Discord community where people share their prompts and workflows.

There is also the WritingWithAI subreddit.


Thank you!


Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Powell's, the usual places.


What context length did you use?


Did they "borrow" bad data this time?


Correct. Lingua franca for at least the last 75 years, if not longer.


For publishing results, yes, but not necessarily for the generation part of it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: