Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more woah's commentslogin

> Last year, SpaceX agreed to invest $2 billion in xAI as part of the startup’s $5 billion equity fundraising, the Wall Street Journal reported at the time.

Sometimes you just need to get the founders in a room together to hash things out and magic can happen.


To be fair, it is no small feat to get all of Elon's personalities to agree with each other

Probably won't be if you don't get good at it.

Is this what the 16,000 were working on?

Most people lived on the knife's edge of starvation before the application of fossil fuel energy and nitrogen to agriculture in the 20th century. That's why the global population exploded after the introduction of these technologies. Read "Energy and Civilization" by Vaclav Smil. For most of history, it was an open question the crops you grew would even contain more calories than the physical effort it took to grow them. This means you were spending ~90% of your time (or money if you were in a specialized trade) just on getting enough carbs in grain to avoid keeling over. And, your diet was 90% grain with almost no variety.

Were there a lucky few who found an unoccupied niche where there was some surplus for a generation or two? Sure. But pretending like this was commonplace is like pretending that everyone in the 1600's was a nobleman.

> Compared to someone from the 1600s who could eat a gourmet meal prepared by their 10 cooks every night, we are quite oppressed.


and then the population exploded such that it could only be sustained through modern agricultural methods. We are married to the technology more than before


Used to be, Tony Soprano could afford a mansion in New Jersey, buy furs for his wife, and eat out at the strip club for lunch every day, all on a single income as a waste management specialist.


Spoken like someone who's never placed a shoebox on a seaboard


Journalists like writing about America walking into disasters


If it bleeds, it leads.


This has absolutely nothing to do with privacy.


That's the point. To surface non-public information as a price signal.


Disagree here. That's the stated goal and the point for some folks, but the subset I explained above also exists and their point is to benefit from a false sense of security.


> state regulator's exclusion/no market lists

I'm not familiar, but this sounds like lists of people who are not allowed to gamble? Do stockbrokers abide by these?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: