Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | schitzapplebits's commentslogin

How can the hardware possibly support that in a usable way?


I think it's purely software translation from x64 -> ARM.


I think the question is whether the performance will be reasonable. Most emulators (e.g. of gaming consoles) struggle to keep up with recent software, since the translation often incurs in a lot of overhead.


Game emulators are running everything emulated. An application running on top of an operating system will hopefully get some benefit of spending time calling native operating system code. It helped a lot back in the day with Apple’s 68K to PPC transition.


Ideally "recent" software that's performance needy will offer native binaries. Emulation is to support the long line of not-recent software


It’s just dynamic binary translation. It isn’t a full system emulator. It works fine for many other implementations.


I assume it's targeted at consumers. Many of them are happy right now with Windows on old Core 2 Duo, Celeron, etc, machines. Assuming a sufficiently fast ARM processor, they may not notice the slowness the same way you would.


As far as I know, more of their brain was dedicated to vision in comparison to ours.


You should hold a pool cue and a rifle based on your dominant eye, not necessarily your dominant hand.


Don’t. Pay attention, write down the things that aren’t in the text book. And then learn to read the text book. It’s a hugely valuable skill.


I'm easily distracted, particularly from internal digressions. Taking notes helps me hold on to the thread.


I’d pay $200 a month for a professional dishwasher, but really I’d probably have to pay much more.


You should email Tim Cook (tcook@apple.com), and see what he says about that.


The fact that you view it as expensive does not make it overpriced. Apple certainly has no trouble selling at their prices.


no problem selling to a minority of users worldwide. The rest simply enjoy PCs and other options and ignore Apple.


So what? Are you claiming that all luxury products are overpriced because most people can't afford them?


The thing is. Both the Suface Pro and Pixel(shining examples of companies not quite being Apple) have sold at exactly the same price as their Apple counterparts for the past few years.


And neither product (I used both) compares to a Mac. There is an elegant simplicity in using a Mac that isn't there when using a PC or other.

Having been a *nix admin for a hair under 20 years, I prefer only Free & OpenBSD to macOS.


Freezing isn't necessarily a bad thing, especially for burger patties with a good amount of fat. I'd rather have that than something that's been sitting around in the fridge for too long. As long as it's frozen very quickly and defrosted properly, freezing is fine.

In-N-Out meat is pretty good; it's just super thin. McDonald's is not good, but believe me, if McDonald's had a good burger patty, and if they wanted to freeze it, it wouldn't be any worse for it.

On the other side of things, In-N-Out doesn't freeze their fries, and they're much worse than the frozen fries from places like McDonald's or Shake Shack's crinkle-cut fries, and it's specifically because they don't do the fry-freeze-refry process critically important for great fries.


The critical thing about great fries is that they are fried twice, once to cook the potato and the second time for the crispy shell. The freeze step in the middle is likely just for transportation logistics.


While the double frying is critical, the freezing step in the middle is not just for logistics. The fries are better when they're frozen post-initial fry. I make fries all the time from scratch, and I always throw them in the freezer before the second fry. The final product is better than when I don't freeze between fries. Freezing helps add irregularity to the surface and aids in crisp them up post second fry.


> Freezing the potatoes causes their moisture to convert to ice, forming sharp, jagged crystals. These crystals damage the cell structure of the potato, making it easier for them to be released once they are heated and convert to steam.

from http://aht.seriouseats.com/archives/2010/05/the-burger-lab-h...


Yeah, you can buy those all-natural 100% potato french fries from the supermarket and fry them into something truly fantastic. When restaurant fries taste "frozen" it's because they're not being refried well.


Who freezes ground beef before turning it into a world-class hamburger? What's the best frozen hamburger I can buy?


> Who freezes ground beef before turning it into a world-class hamburger? What's the best frozen hamburger I can buy?

I do, because I'm not a restaurant, and I don't buy enough meat for one or two servings of hamburger. If a restaurant's been around long enough and has enough turn over, they won't have my problem, but a place could want to freeze for time reasons, or to help with getting a gnarly crust by cooking it from frozen, etc. If you're freezing with the kind of thing the NYC sushi guys use (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/08/nyregion/sushi-fresh-from-...), and defrosting properly, a truly great hamburger could easily be made from a frozen patty.

I've never heard of a good prefrozen hamburger patty unless you're getting something from Snake River Farms or something along those lines (they ship frozen meat). I freeze my own.


When I don't want to take the time to grind my own meat I have the butcher do it for me. I don't know any restaurants that incorporate freezing to improve quality, only to lower costs.


It comes down to logistics. Maybe I'm a smaller restaurant, and I want to serve BBQ or fresh bread. Might not be feasible for them to smoke a brisket every day if they're not a brisket place, but you can definitely freeze some brisket and bring it back to life in pretty good quality. It doesn't improve it, but it lets a restaurant serve something that they otherwise couldn't.

Same goes for fresh bread. Maybe they want to serve pastrami sandwiches in Manhattan, but the best rye bread they can find is in Detroit, and so they have their baker freeze the bread and ship it over. It's not that the bread is better because it was frozen, but they're able to get better bread because they could freeze it.


Yes, these are examples of people maximizing for a variable other than quality. The linked study indicates that the freeze-thaw cycle has significant negative effects on the quality of ground beef. I believe ground meat is probably more damaged by freeze-thaw than whole cuts of meat.

https://www.dti.dk/_/media/66980_Effect%20of%20packaging,%20... (PDF!)


The methodology used for that paper makes it irrelevant for a discussion of optimizing the quality of frozen items——the packaging, the cooked burger doneness (167F), and the fat percentage are all significantly different from what would be used in a high-end commercial setting. I've been saying that a great burger could be cooked with a frozen patty (and you could even freeze the bun as long as you don't freeze them together), not that the freezing itself improves the quality of the meat for typical burger metrics of quality (with the exception of crust formation, which could be much better potentially if cooked from frozen).

Freezing food has a stigma that it doesn't deserve if the freezing and thawing is done with care. As I mentioned before, the best sushi restaurants in Manhattan all freeze their fish and store it in extremely cold freezers, and there's no significant detriment to quality. If Shake Shack wanted to do so, they could freeze their patties, and they'd still have one of the best restaurant burgers out there. They certainly would not be freezing their meat in the way that was done in that burger paper, nor would they be using meat of that quality.


You definitely cannot freeze cooked barbecue brisket and bring it back to life at adequate commercial quality. You can freeze raw brisket, but that doesn't solve the core problem of serving barbecue brisket, which is that it takes so long to cook that you have to either be really good at predicting your turnover or close up early when you run out.

Long story short: freezing brisket, not a great plan.


You certainly can freeze barbecued brisket and bring it back to life in great shape——I've done it plenty of times. It took a lot of trial and error, but it's not impossible. I'm not cooking a 18 hour brisket just to eat a quarter pound of it and toss the rest.


What about imgur?


Only a matter of time before they do something about hotlinking. Direct image links now redirect to tell you to download their app, I'd be surprised if they didn't start watermarking embedded images or putting ads on them. Reddit hosting images on their own site haven't helped imgur


I wrote a simple extension to disable the new direct image link behaviour: https://github.com/DavidBuchanan314/imgur-anti-anti-hotlink


The 'open in app' also helpfully floats over the image on mobile with a nice narrow area to close the floating popup, oh look the store has just opened for me to download the imgur app again, if only they under stood by clicking X I'm never going to want your app.


I consider imgur a poor choice because it doesn't work with JavaScript disabled (dunno how Drive, Dropbox or Photobucket do, just that imgur breaks). It's in the business of serving JPEGs and HTML containing <img> tags pointing to JPEGs; to break that HTML such that those JPEGs don't serve is failing to deliver on its core business.

Sure, use JavaScript to implement infinite scrolling or on-demand loading, but fall back to usable pure HTML.


I'm confused. Which part doesn't work without js, the hosting or uploading?


> Seriously how would it look if Amazon turned down a company because they were competing? It would be an admission of defeat and weakness for AZ. That's not how an "apex predator" thinks.

It looked shitty when it happened with Amazon and Apple


Could you elaborate on what happened? I don't know about this.


I think it's referring to them removing the AppleTV from amazon.com as well as not supporting playback of Amazon Video on the AppleTV https://www.wired.com/2015/10/amazon-apple-tv-chromecast/

The latter decision has been reversed now though https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/05/amazons-prime-video-app-is...


Also, it isn't really Apple's fault for not building an Amazon video app, is it? I mean, it's not like they denied them access to the App Store.

I found this to be really stupid behavior of Amazon. Seemed like they only wanted to push their competing product (Fire TV).

It's good they figured things out, though. A Prime Video app was announced at WWDC.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: