Instead of setting Pi-hole as router-wide DNS, this post shows how to use Tailscale DNS so Pi-hole applies only to selected devices.

This gives you network-wide filtering for your devices without router specific hassle.

I’ve been pleasantly surprised with Tailscale, and by how much functionality it offers even on the free plan.

I am working on a very simple browser extension that allows you to take notes right on youtube. It is open source, offline and everything is locally stored.

Here are the links.

Chrome store: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/video-notes/phgnkid...

Firefox store: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/video-notes-f...

I actually would love some feedbacks and suggestions from someone here :)

The pages don't really show how to export the notes.

Ahh yes, I will add a screenshot in the next update. Thanks you.

If you have not found it, you need to click on the extension icon, and then click on gear icon. There you will find the option to export.

I feel the same and do the same.

Me too.

Working on a browser extension that let's you take notes right on youtube.

Chrome: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/video-notes/phgnkid...

Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/video-notes-f...

Demo here: https://youtu.be/rOi7xQ8DLpo?si=M6pFoHqyrSGKuyIt

Works quite good. And thank god it has an easy name.

For a good month I juggled between Claude Code and Codex CLI and found that Codex CLI did the job better. I recently ditched Claude Code and am currently only using Codex CLI.

You should name this Saitama or One punch man LOL!

> We want to make sure that if you download an app, it’s truly from the developer it claims to be published from, regardless of where you get the app. Verified developers will have the same freedom to distribute their apps directly to users through sideloading or through any app store they prefer.

This makes no sense at all.

Not to mention this doesn't even solve the problem. What's preventing someone from registering and then releasing an app with a similar name to a famous app? Sure, the registration means there's someone you can sue, but it doesn't allow the user to identify the publisher. A "verified publisher" field when you're installing an app would solve both issues (similar to windows[1]), and not require every app developer to register with google.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:User_Account_Control.png

Microsoft does make you register with them to get verified though

Classic strawman argument and corporate tactics of shifting the conversation without addressing real concerns.

Somewhat unrelated: Do you think the UK government and Google have the same PR team?

Thought: Maybe we can organise and collectively hire this PR team to get Google, other big tech, and our governments, to look bad... And get shit done that way... If 2025 is the year of the PR spin, surely the only counter-measure is counter-spin?

Edit: Hold on, I think I just re-invented the concept of a political party.

Oh my god. This is amazing.

Would be great if there was a signup free demo of some sort. As soon as I see a signup page for something that I want to try I just give up.