Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | oriettaxx's commentslogin

what about the #1 result in any research in Apple store

100% shit


No ads in AI? cheap commitment

Ads are more then obsolete

Using ads in AI, today, is like printing flyers when the Internet started, (or sending email ads 30 years ago: of course Google could have promised: "we will not send spam to your gmail mailbox..." :).

"Ads" aim to influence your behavior: AI is a doing much much more with no need for ads (Claude included)


ahhahhm

"but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions"

yes, of course...

the best is this one "We are committed to broad, democratic decision making"

p.s. "One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own", ...ohhh


+1 from me.

In general I would keep an eye on the path CF is following with warp: which is great, but since they are so big and in fast evolution, it is a bit of a mess (their doc is outdated and changes too frequently) not to count (literally) their support (free version, and our company's opinion only, of course) since on warp it is totally useless.


Roger that!


where is it mentioned?

ZeroZeroZero is by Saviano, article is about Sciascia.


My bad, went down rabbit hole and got my writers/links confused.

:)

(just as me :)


by "they" do you mean Mussolini?

What exactly Leonardo Sciascia mean in his "Porte Aperte" is the fascism merely "anesthetize" the mafia rather than eradicating it (gaining temporary Sicilian consent through illusionary repression)


Well: while measuring spinning durations of different spinning tops one should apply the same strength: not easy if done by hand

I am curious:

* will spinning *direction* (clockwise, or anti-clockwise) effect spinning duration?

* and being in Northern Hemisphere vs South Hemisphere (Coriolis effect)?


Coriolis forces appear only on objects that have a translation motion relative to the Earth, and which also has a direction distinct from that of the rotation of the Earth, i.e. either a north to south (or reverse) or vertical motion.

If the axis of the spinning top is stationary relatively to Earth, there are no Coriolis forces.

For a big spinning top, there could be non-negligible periodic Coriolis forces acting on the periphery of the spinning top, but they would be compensated by the rigidity of the top and in any case their average over a complete rotation of the top would be null.


100% for google.com (testing from within the EU)

interesting: it may not be a mistake

can somebody explain?


"if laws are not being enforced, it might be prudent to repeal them."

agree


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: