Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jamaicahest's commentslogin

Could personhood be applied to autonomous cars, potentially absolving manufacturers of all liability, if a car they built, kills a human being?


Shokz


Suunto makes them better these days.


I think the reason AirTag works is because Apple turns it on-by-default on i-devices and people can't be bothered to go turn it off. For a chat to work on the same scale it would literally need Apple or Google to ship it as enabled-by-default on all phones.


20+ years as a professional developer and I still have to argue with coworkers on why MongoDb is a terrible fit for their data, which is clearly relational, just because said coworkers can't be bothered to learn SQL.


> High currents, often resulting from rapid charging, quick acceleration, or high-speed driving, can negatively affect the battery’s state of health.

So to preserve battery health I need to spend 8 hours charging the battery at opposed to 45 minutes? Not a great selling point for EVs.


> Not a great selling point for EVs.

Depends on how you look at it ( and your circumstances ). I plug in at night and wake up to a fully charged, defrosted and pre-heated car.

Whether it took 45 minutes or 8 hours doesn’t matter, and not having to visit a petrol station once a week to pay 4x the cost is something I see as being a good selling point.


Also don’t drive it fast or in a spirited manner. The future is here, and no fun is allowed.


Driving any car like that will result in increased stress on components and wear. A lot of EVs have high-end sports-car levels of acceleration, and those aren’t known for being low-maintenance.


The difference to me is how that is applied. For most cars, including performance vehicles, you can minimize the impact of this by waiting until the car is warmed up, using the correct oil weight and changing it regularly, changing the air filter, etc. With an electric vehicle the wear seems more integral to the usage of it compared to an ICE.


Yeah, that’s true - it’s integral because an EV retains all of its components throughout its lifespan.

If we consider an ICE car’s fuel as a “component”, then it’s an interesting comparison: fuel is basically maximally degraded - it accumulates as much “wear” as possible - and then it’s jettisoned so what remains attached to the vehicle is comparatively less worn.


> then that has to be replaced by finding the perfect candidate who can immediately be productive.

We're called freelance consultants. And we charge a high price for that service.


yes and companies basically are just paying that high price with a salary


> (which AFAIK you only need for NVIDIA GPUs).

Which is what a lot of users have.


Yes, and in the driver manager you can install the relevant drivers with a few clicks


An alternative in sitautions where OTP-only is allowed. E.g. I work as a freelance contractor and every single customer requires MFA with GPS tracking. Some also require accessing Bluetooth on the phone.


GrapheneOS is nice for people using Google Pixel phones. And useless for anyone else.


FWIW the Pixel 8, the newest device offering Advanced Memory Protection, sells for less than $600 brand new right now. You can tune memory tagging & hardened memory allocation on a per-app basis. It's a game changer


You are saying that as if it was cheap. I am pretty sure most people buy <$250 smartphones. That is at least the case in my social circle, very few iphones, pixel, an awful lot of cheap Xiaomi Redmi and the Samsung Galaxies are usually the A line instead of the S line.


If someone uses Xiaomi they probably also don't worry about privacy.


At least it is possible (really annoying process) to unlock the bootloader on Xiaomi devices.


Forgive my ignorance, but what is it about GrapheneOS that makes it better on Pixel devices?


It’s only available for Pixels.


Ah, that would do it!


It's due to hardware reasons just as an FYI - I forget the specifics, so forgive me if this is dated, but I believe it had to do with some crypto-specific chip if I remember right.


Yeah the proprietary blackbox security chip that they pinky promised to open source but never did...


How is this something "every programmer should know" ? I mean 95% of us work with software that is not performance critical, where security/auditing/monitoring/stability/maintainability/etc. is more important than raw performance.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: